Hamlet: Character Analysis :: essays research papers

everywhere the centuries many people deport complained that William Shakespeare did an wretched job of steering the readers of critical point to a specific description of each(prenominal) character. Each reader is left to decide the true extent of critical points evil and insane ways or to realize that he clearly is a victim of circumstances beyond his control, therefore declaring him free. Because of William Shakespeares writing style, the reader receives little help in discovering who is truly innocent and who is as guilty as Claudius. Many scholars agree that settlement may be the most complex character presented by any playwrite. Over the centuries critics have offered many theories and explanations for Hamlets actions, but none have sufficiently explained him. Many people office Hamlet as a deeply troubled youth who caused many unnecessary deaths, such as those of Polonius and Laertes. Critics who support this theory point out the cruel actions carried out by Hamlet, one example being the indifferent and boastful way Hamlet describes the ingenious way he had his two good friend, Rosencrantz and Guildentsern killed.But flag thou hear now how I did proceed?I sit down, devised a new commission, wrote it fair. I once did hold it, as our satists do, a baseness to write fair, labored much how to forget that learning, but, sir, now it did me a yeomans service. Wilt thou know th force-out of what I wrote?An earnest conjuration from the King, as England was his faithful tributarythat on the view and knowing of the contents, without debatement further more or less, he should those bearers retch to sudden death. (Shakespeare 5228-45)The way Hamlet treats Ophelia, the woman he supposedly loved, also supports the portrayal of him being a barbarian. If thou dost marry ,Ill oblige thee this plague for thy dowry be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shalt not escape calumny. add up thee to a nunneryreferring to a brothel, go and quickly, too.(Sh akespeare 31 136-141)Another offered interpretation suggests that using the information given by the ghost of King Hamlet, Hamlet seized the opportunity to regain what was rightfully his-the throne of Denmark. One less universal belief that has been expressed states that Hamlet was actually a girl, raised as a man, so there would be an heir to the throne. Critics who support this view say that this theory explains Hamlets reluctance and hesitation to give murder(which is most often viewed as a masculine act).